From: tgpedersen
Message: 44224
Date: 2006-04-10
>as
> On 2006-04-08 12:04, tgpedersen wrote:
>
> > Exactly. A root with Jens' *O- as prefix is a compound with *O
> > first element. The question is whether any first element willcause
> > the same effects as an *O-prefix.That would be an athematic *-bhr.t. I proposed that they would
>
> No. Other kinds of agentive compounds (especially the dHarma-bHr.t-
> type) seems to be older, and no such effect is visible in them.
>Nor domembers (the
> we have any o-grades in pure root nouns occurring as second
> nr.-han- type, which also includes Latin compounds with -spex, -ceps,
> etc.). There is no O-infixation in typical bahuvrihis -- probablythe
> most widespread type of compound in PIE.No o-grade, you mean, or the argument is circular. But reflexes of
>
> Besides, O-infixationo-grade
>occurs regularly in at least one morphologicalI think the PIE verbal root itself was a verbal noun. From it we
> category in which it can't be decompositional -- the
> causative/iterative verbs like *monéje/o-.
>