--- In
cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Abdullah Konushevci"
<akonushevci@...> wrote:
> Look, Marius, I am tired from yours abracadabra derivations So,
please, do address to other and leave
> me alone, for I can't digest yours "derivations".
>
> Konushevci
>
So to resume you position here:
1. *neu-ks > ksunta: is in your opionion 'a logical' inversion and
for sure there is 'no abracadabra' inside?
But if I remember well the 'abracadabra' notion 'usually' includes
some 'magic inversions'....:)
In these conditions, could I ask you: Why a *-ks- there? To
have 'what to invert' next?
Cheers,
Marius