From: Anders R. Joergensen
Message: 43867
Date: 2006-03-15
> > In Irish we then find delabialization of *kW and *gWI'm not really sure what you're getting at. OIr. <guidid> is
> > (> c and g).
> > However, one can still tell the existence of earlier
> > labialization
> > on the rounding effect of a following /a/ (> /o/)
> > and /i/ (> /u/),
> > e.g. *gWaneti > gonaid, *gWediti > *gWidhith
> > (raising) > guidid,
> > etc. And of course <Q> (= /kW/) and <NG> (= /gW/) in
> > ogam.
>
> I'm fairly certain that's /guD^iD^/ or similar, not
> /giD^iD^/ indicating e>i before Cy (from *gWHedhye-
> similar to Greek thessasthai "pray for"). There's no
> reason to assume *gWaneti with a>o not *gWeneti with
> e>o. In Welsh e>e~>a~>a before nasals explaining go-
> vs gwa- here.
>E.g. MW gwaew 'spear' < gwoew < *gaisu- (which should have given
> > The alleged exmaples of
> > initial PCelt.
> > *g- > Brit. *gw- are simply wrong.
>
> What examples?
>