From: Sean Whalen
Message: 43827
Date: 2006-03-14
> At 5:38:27 PM on Tuesday, March 14, 2006, SeanNo problem. I just wasn't certain how you felt
> Whalen wrote:
>
> > Whatever the status of this example, and I don't
> know what
> > analogy could cause g>gW here, most seem certain
> to show
> > gHW and w > gw initially in P-Celtic.
>
> I certainly have no problem with *w- > gw-. My
> initial
> objection to *gWH- > gw- was based on Jackson, and
> it's
> clear that there's more going on there than I had
> realized;
> in the previous posts I was specifically objecting
> to the
> *example*.