From: Sean Whalen
Message: 43809
Date: 2006-03-14
> --- "Brian M. Scott" <BMScott@...> wrote:After even more checking I'm certain gWH>gW did NOT
>
> > At 1:24:09 AM on Tuesday, March 14, 2006, Sean
> > Whalen wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Also, I seem to remember gWH > gW
> > *g, *gH, and *gWH all become OIr /g/; *gW becomes
> > OIr /b/.
> > Jackson says that all of this is Common Celtic, at
> > least
> > initially.
>
> I looked at a few sources (most very old) but it
> seems like gWH remains separate from gH: