[tied] Re: The physical type of proto-Indo-Europeans

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh <gknysh@...> wrote:

>
>
>
> --- mkelkar2003 <smykelkar@...> wrote:
>
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh
> > <gknysh@> wrote:
> > The OIT is a total non-starter in this
> > > respect. It's not even headed towards the
> > ballpark. It
> > > is a complete and utter waste of time.*****
> >
> > The OIT may not be a non starter. See below
> > (Kalyanaraman and Kelkar
> > 2005).
>
> *****GK: There's nothing to see.

Even the current family tree as drawn by IEL (which is in need of some
serious revision imho), can be explained with migrations out of South
Asia as explained on page 80 of proto vedic continuity.doc

Which is my point.

> OIT cannot demonstrate any archaeological continuity
> leading from India to Europe,

There is no archaeological continity the other way round either, as I
have shown by quoting Kenoyer a leading expert in South Asian
archaeology.

and has no equivalent to

> the Klejn approach (no pre-"historical Aryans" culture
> in India has any affinities to European ones of the
> relevant time frame).Hence, a complete
> non-starter.*****

There is no archaeological evidence to confirm any of the massive
migrations hypothesized by IEL. see p. 23 of proto vedic continuity
theory.doc.

Thanks!

M. Kelkar

>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>