From: mkelkar2003
Message: 43471
Date: 2006-02-17
>RACE with
> Dear all,
>
> While it may be assumed to be wrong to oversimplistically equate
> LANGUAGE as a hard and fast general rule, especially since themodern ages
> of widespread migrations, cross-cultural and cross-racial intermarriages(South and
> in newly founded countries based on melting pots like in America
> North alike),latinizing
> not to mention the distant effects of linguistic
> acculturation/deculturation/imperialism (whatever one shall call it)
> bequeathed down from the colonial eras of ancient (i.e. forced
> and racial intermingling imposed on Roman conquered provinces) andmodern
> times (European colonial empires),(exploring
> one must not deny the obvious fact that there has always been a strong
> CORRELATION between
> RACE and LANGUAGE, as has amply been proven not only by genetics
> the genotypes),Northern
> but also more evidently simply by the phenotypes (outward racial
> appeareance) of Indo-Europeans:
> e.g. there are striking similitudes in the facial features of many
> Indians, Persians and Europeans,Please refer to our paper, proto vedic continuity theory.doc in the
> attesting to an Indo-European common ancestry.
>think...
> Besides, to harp back on an old, if not corny, cliché, blue-eyed
> fair-skinned Nordic-looking Persians or Indians with typically European
> facial bone structures are infinitely more numerous than you would
>that had
> Just as a reminder, when Prof. Victor Mair somewhat pompously announced
> (back in 1997) the long-awaited results of Mitchrondrial DNA analysis
> performed by Prof. Paolo Francalacci on Xinjiang mummies sample tissues
> (while Prof. Cavalli-Sforza had defected from the scientific team
> been sent to China), confirming their PURELY Indo-European (possibilyup and
> ancient Tokharian or Persian) origins, someone in the audience stood
> naively exclaimed :the very
> "Why did we have to wait so long to learn what we already knew by
> look of these mummies?".than
> Well the answer may well be that sceptics need scientific proof more
> Science itself...speaking
>
> Regards
>
> Cyrus
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "P&G" <G&P@...>
> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 9:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [tied] Re: The physical type of proto-Indo-Europeans
>
>
> > > Is it well documented what the original Indo-Europeans looked like.
> >
> > Don't confuse race with language. Even if we could recover what some
> > original race looked like, there is nothing to stop other races
> the
> > same language.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>