At 6:43:28 AM on Sunday, February 5, 2006, Patrick Ryan
wrote:
[...]
> Trask willingly conceded the _possibility_ that all
> language descended from one common ancestor.
> At the same time, he fervently _believed_ that any
> information regarding that most ancient ancestor was not
> retrievable;
Yes, because he understood exactly why this is the case. It
isn't, as you are trying to suggest, a matter of blind
belief or faith; it follows directly from what we know about
linguistic change and the age of human language. If any
signal of common ancestry has actually persisted down to the
present, it cannot rise above the level of the background
noise and therefore cannot be shown to exist. Looking for
traces of proto-world is a waste of time; believing that one
has found them is at best naive.
> and, I fault him for this, was unwilling to seriously look
> at anything which purported to prove otherwise.
He looked seriously enough to eviscerate the Basque evidence
offered by Bengtson and Ruhlen. (Some of this evisceration
is, I think, unpublished save in a series of posts to
sci.lang made in late 2003 in a thread 'Ruhlen's way with
words'. It is presented in his usual clear style.)
[...]
Brian