Re: [tied] Re: Vilga

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 42581
Date: 2005-12-21

Aigius wrote:

> Lithuanian VIL~KO > VOL~KO > VO~LO~KO > Russian VO~LOK, like:
> Latvian ZEL~TAS > Russian ZO~LO~TO
> Latvian ZEL~TAS > Polish ZLA~TO
> Lithunian KAR~VE > Russian KO~RO~VA
> Lithuanian KAR~VE > Polish KRA~VA
> Lithuanian GAR~DAS > Russian GO~ROD
> Lithuanian GAR~DAS > Polish GRAD...

None of these Polish forms is correct (they should be <zl/oto, krowa,
grĂ³d>. Yes, we all know that Baltic and Slavic are closely related, but
your arrow suggests that the Slavic forms are descended from the
Lithuanian ones, which they are not. They merely come from a common
(Proto-Balto-Slavic) source.

Piotr

Previous in thread: 42580
Next in thread: 42595
Previous message: 42580
Next message: 42582

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts