--- In
cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Ryan" <proto-language@...>
wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@...>
> > Unfortunately very often in our days, the positive ideologies
> > have replaced a solid argumentation (but at least we have learned
in
> > this mode that the negative ones are negative, isn't it? ...maybe
> > this was the price to be paid...)
> >
> > Marius
> >
> > P.S. ...and saying this, I didn't intend at all to say that
negative
> > ideologies have used solid argumentations.
>
> ***
> Patrick:
>
> That's awfully white of you, Marius.
>
> ***
I'm not 'so white' as you describe me here (I hope that I
understood well your expression, based on my poor english...) ....but
I don't like any kind of ideological tricks ...
Because you have said this, I feel also that I need to clarify my
ideology here:
1. if you talk about English or French occupation in Africa I
will sustain the African peoples....
2. if you talk about English occupation in India I will sustain
the Indian people
3. if you talk about the emigrants in France or in England that
makes some disasters there, I will sustain the English and the French
people
4. finally if you talk about Dacians and the Roman's Occupation
in Dacia I will sustain the Dacian people...
Maybe is a very simple ideology this one....but for sure is a right
one. Is this a 'white' ideology? I don't think so....
Marius