Re: Substrates in Reconstructed-PIE itself??

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh <gknysh@...> wrote:

>
> ****GK: Kawami needs a refresher course. Gimbutas'
> theory, defective as it is, is primarily about the
> Eneolithic Age.*****
>

Eneolithic? Is that a hybrid for Chalcolithic? I gather it is
"a(h)eneus" lying behind. Is there any difference between the terms?

Lars