From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 42404
Date: 2005-12-05
> there is nothing to bother about. The word is an adjective made uplike
> the participial adjectives with the suffix "-at"; presumabelythere has
> been once a verb "a in/*roshca" which now is completely replacedby
> "inroshi" and it has survived just the adjective "roshcat".with no
> There is the need for an explanation about "u" > "o" apparently
> reason. Maybe the word has been simply influenced by "roshu"(red)and it
> became "roshkat" from an "rushkat" but this is simply speculation.There are also some flowers with the name ruscuTa in Romanian:
>
>
> Alex
>