[tied] Re: Question on Albanian sy

From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 42392
Date: 2005-12-02

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@...>
wrote:

> b) Regarding other words (not the verbs) : here is a list of them
> (but not all of them) with 'visible' intervocalic dh
>
> vjedhull
> i hidhët
> hidhës
> hedhe
> gdhe (for sure intervocalic in PAlb)
> edhe
> kadhë
> kedh pl. kedha
>
> Do we have here enough examples Richard, or you want that I post
> some more?
> Could you explain all these examples 'via English', again?

No, I don't have ready access to an Albanian dictionary. (The nearest
one I know of is in the reference - not loan! - section of a public
library 50 minutes' drive away!) Therefore, for all I know, /D/ could
derive from PIE *g^ or *g^H in all of these cases. Pokorny agrees
that _vjedh_ derives from PIE *weg^H, so I don't think there is a
problem with _vjedhull_ 'badger'.

On what basis do you claim contrariwise that /D/ from *d or *dH merged
with the outcomes of PIE *g^and *g^H before the loss of intervocalic /D/?

It's possible that there is an analogical restoration in the plural
_kedha_ of _kedh_ - what sort of irregularities does Albanian tolerate
in plurals in -a?

Richard.