From: Patrick Ryan
Message: 42007
Date: 2005-11-10
----- Original Message -----
From: "david_russell_watson" <liberty@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 10:13 PM
Subject: [tied] Re: Also an Austro-Asiatic Disconnect
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Ryan" <proto-language@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > I have no horse in this race but I cannot permit scientifically
> > unsound ideas to be propagated without, at least, a challenge.
> >
> > Color (of skin, hair, and eyes) _is_ a genetically inherited
> > feature.
> >
> > While only upper-class humans seem to take it into consideration
> > when reproducing, traits like color are maintained and enhanced
> > through scientific animal breeding.
>
> And what exactly is the "scientifically sound" definition
> of an "upper-class human"?
***
Patrick:
Someone who does not call another person a 'lune' (sic!).
***
> I have no doubt that you consider yourself one of these
> creatures, but exactly upon what basis do you believe
> that so?
***
Patrick:
I do not believe that to be so. Middle-class all the way.
***
> I would have thought your name Irish, but who has ever
> hear of an Irish nobleman, so what is it then?
***
Patrick:
I guess I should expect anti-Irish vilification from someone like you.
The Irish did have a noble class before the British butchered most of them,
including the infants.
Ryan, by the way, means 'king'.
***
> Moreover, since it doesn't seem that you ever stick your
> head out of your own house, I have to inform you that
> within EVERY class, by whatever criteria that you define
> a "class", there are individuals of VARIOUS tastes in
> regard to racial features for the purpose of selecting a
> partner for "reproducing".
***
Patrick:
Among the upper classes, the preference is for intelligence and demonstrated
ability over generations to accumulate wealth - attractive physical
features, the only criterion for low-bred people like yourself, is the last
consideration for them.
***
> > Francesco, I respect what you are contributing to the discussion
> > in general but you must rid yourself of these out-of-date half-
> > explanations.
>
> Racism is out of date too.
>
> Gods what a freaking lune you are!
***
Patrick:
Not a word on the science of the question!
Of which you are obvious incapable of contributing.
It is 'loon' rather than your ignorantly misspelled "lune".