Re: [tied] Re: Proto Vedic Continuity Theory of Bharatiya (Indian)

From: george knysh
Message: 41974
Date: 2005-11-09

--- tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...> wrote:

> Here's an example:
>
> Languages X and Y are assumed descended from
> reconstructed language
> Z.
>
> Language X is spoken in area A.
>
> Language Y is spoken in area B.
>
> Therefore language Z was spoken in area B.
>
> Is this correct logic?

****GK: Not unless you assume that the descent of Y
from Z occurred in area B.****
>
>
> Torsten
>
>
>
>
>
>





__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com