[tied] Re: Proto Vedic Continuity Theory of Bharatiya (Indian) Lang

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alex" <alxmoeller@...> wrote:

>
> david_russell_watson wrote:
>
> > The answer, whatever it is, neither lends anything nor
> > takes anything away from your own argument, but which
> > wasn't Alex's intent in any case, as he writes above
> > "Reverting to a seriously meant consideration", meaning
> > that nothing he wrote was seriously intended as support
> > for your claims.
>
> that is true. However, just for the rightness of the arguments,

there is

> indeed an Out of Inda migration which is known to us and this is

prooved

> by Gypsies as I mentioned.In the same manner, there is too a

Invasion in

> India known to us and this is the Invasion of Nordic part of India due
> Alexander the Great.
> We do not know what did happen 1000-2000 years before Alexander the
> Great and I doubt there is any chances to find it out. The bad part of
> the India as being IE-Homeland is the singularity of the movement. Why
> all migrating tribes from India kept going West?

Please see 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 (estimated reading time 3.2 min) of the
following link:

http://koenraadelst.voiceofdharma.com/books/ait/ch33.htm

"It is easy to see how and why the tendency to asymmetric expansion in
the case of other languages also applies to India as the Urheimat of IE."

M. kelkar

> India is just the most far away point reached by IE speaking people

in a

> radial movement(expting Tocharian which has a more northic point). On
> another hand, all migrations known to us are coming from Asia to

Europe,

> from imemorial times, the only big Migration from West of Europe to

East

> being that one of the Celts and with in a less importance, the one of
> the Germans.( specialy the Goths since the Herules and Bastarnae have
> not reached so far as the Goths).
>
> Alex
>