Re: [tied] Re: Proto Vedic Continuity Theory of Bharatiya (Indian)

From: Patrick Ryan
Message: 41921
Date: 2005-11-08

What excellent resources you have provided for us!

Thank you.


Patrick

----- Original Message -----
From: "Francesco Brighenti" <frabrig@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 9:23 AM
Subject: [tied] Re: Proto Vedic Continuity Theory of Bharatiya (Indian)
Languages


>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...>
> wrote:
>
> > For this [OIT] scenario to be proven wrong once and for all, it
> should be > proven wrong for any possible value of the parameters
> you ask me to > specify (and the number of possible values for each
> parameter is > finite and relatively small, so it should be
> practically possible > too). If I had provided any values, you might
> be able to prove the > scenario wrong for exactly those values, but
> _not_ (obviously) for > any other given set of parameter values. So
> the menace of this > scenario being possibly right would live on.
>
>
> Read these first. Then come back.
>
> http://www.bharatvani.org/books/rig/
> http://users.primushost.com/~india/ejvs/ejvs0702/ejvs0702article.pdf
>
> Regards,
> Francesco Brighenti
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>