Re: [tied] Re: Proto Vedic Continuity Theory of Bharatiya (Indian)

From: glen gordon
Message: 41829
Date: 2005-11-06

David:
> That was me who mentioned substances, Glen, not
> Patrick.

Sorry, you're all starting to blur together to me.


> Since you've referred yourself a few times before to
> bongs and the like, I didn't think you'd be offended
> by my little joke.

The (il)logical structure of an ad hominem is:

1. A makes claim B
2. There is something objectionable about A
3. Ergo, claim B is false.

Your comment qualifies as an ad hominem. There's a
strict difference in most cultures between joking
about oneself and joking about another. One is the
basis of many a comic's humour, the other abusive.


= gLeN




__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com