--- mkelkar2003 <
smykelkar@...> wrote:
> The reconstructed PIE and the currently accepted
> language tree are
> certainly elegant and a great intellectual
> achievement. But doubts
> have been cast on the *historicity* of them. Please
> refer to:
>
> sections 5.1 and 9.7 of proto vedic continuity
> theory.doc in the files
> section.
>
> M. kelkar
*****GK: As to 5.1. To say that Mycaenean Greek
innovations and/or lack of innovations "make the
construction of a 'proto-Greek' language logically
impossible" is clearly erroneous, at least on the
evidence of the Garrett quotes. == As for 9.7, I
believe the Kazanas claim about Vedic has already been
dealt with a number of times on this list. Anyone may
cast "doubts" about anything. I can say that I doubt
M. Kelkar exists. There is a difference between such
doubts and reasonable doubts.(:=)))*****
__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com