From: A.
Message: 41742
Date: 2005-11-04
>Woohooo.. I finally got it right :^)
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "A." <xthanex@...> wrote:
> >
> > So PIE *H2rtó- > PII *H2rtá- > both rta- and asha-
>
> Yep.
>Agreed, my primary focus is the study of comparative PIE religions,
> > Your closing paragraph summarized the issue nicely for me.
> > Sadly (from my POV), having read your words, it seems there
> > is no evidence to support a cognate to Rta among the European
> > languages - so much for the ambition of discovering one!
>
> Well there might have been a concept of something like
> Rta, only under some other name. Think on how 'moksa-'
> and 'nirvana-' refer to more or less the same thing,
> and how if all evidence of 'moksa-' had disappeared, we
> might now suppose that the concept was first introduced
> from Buddhism.
>Well I have to say, your explanations have been the clearest I've
> Oh not at all, and there are surely people on this list
> better qualified to answer your questions than me, but
> is bothers me so whenever your questions go unanswered
> that I just had to give it a try myself.