From: A.
Message: 41720
Date: 2005-11-03
>Thank you, I needed it spelled out for me. I'll admit to being rather
> "H2rtó-" is the short answer
> to your question, about "the final PIE term (before the
> switch to a purely I-I term)".
> So while 'rta-' and 'asha-' evolved fromSo the Proto-Indo-Iranian *H2rtá- was the/an antecedent of rta- and
> a Proto-Indo-Iranian *H2rtá-,
>So PIE *H2rtó- > PII *H2rtá- > both rta- and asha-
> Well as per above, there can be no missing links between
> them because P.I.I. *H2rtá- didn't evolve from P.I.E.
> *H2ar-, but rather from P.I.E. *H2rtó-.
> If I may say so, I suspect that you're trying to findThat was precisely my hope :^)
> connections for the European forms with the cosmological
> significance attached to the Indo-Iranian derivatives
> of *H2rtá-, but which I'm afraid simply don't exist.
> TheYour closing paragraph summarized the issue nicely for me. Sadly
> original meaning of the P.I.E. root was purely mundane,
> and referred to the proper assembling, setting up, or
> outfitting of something. In this way, at one time and in
> the Indo-Iranian branch alone, the word for "(properly)
> fitted, put together" was used to name the Proto-Indo-
> Iranians concept of the greater world order, but even in
> Indo-Iranian that specialized meaning was one only of
> the extended form *H2rtá- and its reflexes, not of its
> root *H2ar- or any of its other extensions.
>
> David