Re: [tied] Re: Slavic palatalistions: why /c^/, /c/?

Miguel Carrasquer wrote:

> On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:34:10 +0000, tgpedersen
> <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
>
>> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:
>
>>> Sometimes /k/ palatalizes to /c^/, and /t/ palatalizes to
>>> /c/, sometimes it's the other way around,
>>
>> Erh, what? Do you have examples of both?
>
> Italian kj > c^ (bracchium > braccio), tj > c (gratia >
> grazia).
>
> Spanish kj > c (bracchium > braço), jt > c^ (lectu > lejto >
> lecho).

it seems I did not understood properly the question of Torsten. I have
had the feeling he is asking for
the two reflexes in one and the same language, not in different
languages.

Alex