From: david_russell_watson
Message: 41590
Date: 2005-10-25
> >The root of all three is the zero-grade of the verb *ar-,
> > I know that the Sanskrit Rta, Sanskrit Ritu, and Avestan Asha
> > all ultimately derive from the PIE root *Ar- "to fit together"
> > but what I am unsure about are the intermediate stages between
> > *Ar- and the finished terms.
> >
> > Could anyone clarify whether the terms Rta/Ritu/Asha stem from
> > the suffixed form *ar-ti- from which we get artisan and the
> > Greek artios 'fitting'?
> I have read that the Avestan term Asha began as Arta and wasYes, all from a Proto-Indo-Iranian *rta-.
> softened to arsha and subsequently "asha"; and is also found
> in the forms: arsh, eresh, arta, ereta.
> The term ARTA is found in names of Mitanni and Iranian descent:- edit -
> I am unaware of any earlier Hittite, Anatolian, or ScythianSome Scythian and Sarmatian names contain the element 'ard-',
> evidence.
> Seeing the term Arta existing among the Mitanni and IranianI had thought that all of the forms in question, including
> tribes I *ASSUME* that the etymology of the Sanskrit Rta
> stems from one of the suffixed forms of *Ar- such as *ar-ti,
> *ar-tu-, *ar-to-, or even *ar-tio-.
> Of course my assumption may be completely off base.
> I am searching for 3 things:and
> 1) Confirmation or correction in regards to the etymology of
> Rta/Arta/Asha.
> 2) What are the nearest Sanskrit and Avestan linguistic relatives
> what do those related words mean?Arete
> 3) What European or Mediterranean terms developed from the most
> recent shared PIE common ancestor? (Such as did the Greek term
> derive from the same suffixed PIE root which gave rise to Arta?)I'm fairly sure that I've come across at least one article
> Any help at all would mean a great deal to me!Sorry that I couldn't give you much.