From: david_russell_watson
Message: 41355
Date: 2005-10-13
>Sorry, that should have been 'subscribe'.
> "By me, at least"?! You make it sound as if Trask weren't
> widely appreciated and missed, which he most certainly is,
> or that those who don't ascribe to your own theories
> are somehow going against Trask by doing so, when the truthI meant by agreeing on _both_ points with Trask, my thinking
> is again quite the opposite.
> And I agree with Trask on that too, and so on both of your
> points my thinking is closer to Trask's than yours.