From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 41024
Date: 2005-10-04
> As I have already written, the null-grade form (C)VC roots tended to beI mean the "plain" -je- presents, i.e. default duratives usually
> eliminated in such or another way. And I do not think that all CVC-jo/e-
> presents have the vowel -a- in Latin (perhaps two initial consonants
> prevented the change e > a in Latin, it is really interesting problem which
> should be thoroughfully analyzed). So, when you speak about 10%-20%, do you
> mean PIE *-je- presents from roots of different structures?
> I would like toWell, we have *nék^-je/o- (Skt. nás'yati 'perish', the nil grade od the
> know if there are full grade *-je- presents from "ablautable" roots (i.e.
> from roots which has reduced or null grades in other forms).
> And even ifThe Germanic accentuation of the verb. Unlike Sanskrit (and Greek!),
> there are, from where are you taking your conviction that *kap-jo/e- belongs
> to this small 10%-20% group?
> Btw. what is the explanation for such strange verbal forms with stressedIn Sanskrit? I'm not sure what the orthodox explanation is, but
> reduced/null grade?