Patrick rewords:
> I was asking for a recognized source that had
> *<ruma>, 'ford, bridge'.
Then you should have said that. If that were your
initial query, you'd be supported. In that case,
you'd be correct in saying that such a translation
is baseless, but I've already said that.
> "More puerile jabs"? Is that not a puerile jab?
A link showing information for others to benefit
from is not a puerile jab. Your attack of others for
questioning your ludicrous falsehoods is. Case in
point.
= gLeN
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com