Me, trying to explain that rareness is not the way
to justify a logically valid theory:
> Glenn: "So let's have an oddball IE party?" Is
> that what you're saying? I don't think so. When
> you add the screwy *k^-*k distribution with the
> absence of *b [...]
Mat(t)e quips:
> Heard of Lifu? No?
The Micronesian language, yes. Heard of Logic?
You're again using rarity to support outlandish
claims but I guess some people will never get it.
Chalk it up to genetics, I guess.
Mate starts to get insecure and condascending:
> Heard of Kelabit? No? I thought so...
Heard of Klingon, the language of Mu, the Neep-Neep
language of Zakaboo? Who the hell cares? What are
you trying to prove? That you watch Jeopardy? We're
talking about IE, the _theory_, the badly structured
theory that needs to be restructured to meet
linguistic _norms_.
= gLeN
______________________________________________________
Yahoo! for Good
Donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/