Re: Re[2]: ka and k^a [was: [tied] *kW- "?"]

On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:43:06 -0700 (PDT), glen gordon
<glengordon01@...> wrote:

>
>> Glen's statement that lack of final aspiration
>> entails pre-glottalization is a non-sequitur.
>> Aspiration and glottalization have no necessary
>> connection.
>
>It does when "hat" is pronounced /ha?/, not */hah/.

Once again: [ha?] (or [hæ?], whatever it is in Winnipeg).


=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...