Re[4]: [tied] *kW- "?"

At 13:09:44 on Friday, 23 September 2005, Grzegorz
Jagodzinski wrote:

> Brian M. Scott wrote:

>> At 4:10:21 PM on Wednesday, September 21, 2005, Grzegorz
>> Jagodzinski wrote:

>>> So, "gH" means for me "g" plus a laryngeal.

>> In the normal usage here it's the voiced aspirate,

> Sorry, what do you mean writing "normal"?

Just what I said: on this list ('usage here') it is my
experience that <gH> is more likely to represent the voiced
aspirate than stop + laryngeal.

I'm not fanatical about it; I can live with anything
reasonable, and in most potentially problematic cases the
correct interpretation is pretty clear from context. I
could wish for a little more uniformity, but that's a pipe
dream.

Brian