From: Grzegorz Jagodzinski
Message: 40393
Date: 2005-09-23
> Grzegorz:Some linguists. And others said it was absent. Then the discussion should
>> The discussion here is about *ka, *k^a etc. in PIE.
>> But who said they were really present?
>
> Linguists.
> I can't conceive of an attested vowelAnd I can.
> system without a low vowel /a/. Can you?
> Ergo, *aIs a without doubt in English or in Late Common Slavic? If yes, show it to
> is there without a doubt in IE, even if it's rare.
>> Please consult the Lubotsky's article "Against aWhy? Notice that *H used to yield a vowel (E, call it "schwa" or what you
>> Proto-Indo-European phoneme *a", [...]
>
> He's right about these instances of *a, yes, but
> I think he might be going too far in some cases
> like *was-. I don't think it truly was **wHs- at
> the very last stage of IE. Vocalization of laryngeals
> in these positions would have occured early on.
> It's also possible, especially if the vocalizationNo, not n.H2sos, but nH2.sos > nasos. If there were two intial sounds of the
> of some of these laryngeals occured early that
> there would be a few common stems with an
> alternation of accented *eh2 and unaccented *a...
> So for example, nominative *neh2s "nose" but
> genitive *nasós "of the nose". Afterall, IE
> phonotactics tell us that there would be an initial
> syllable nasal in the genitive if it were *nh2sos
> and it would be expressed as **n.h2sos instead!
>If you think of *a < *H, then you may be right. But if you think of any
> So... *a is needed.
> = gLeN