Re: [tied] Albanian outside the centum-satem division?

Grzegorz Jagodzinski wrote:

> As one can see from the Abdullah's list, the development of *k^, *g^(h) in
> Albanian was very complex and there are no one single continuants of the
> previous IE prevelars ("palatals"). Together with "regular" th < *k^ and dh
> < *g^ we can see:

See http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/29877

and the discussion that followed.

Piotr