Re: [tied] *kW- "?"

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, glen gordon <glengordon01@...> wrote:

> Miguel:
> > It won't do to leave that to random alternation.
> > There has to be a rule to explain why we have both
> > *ka and *ke.
>
> I still suspect flaws in the IE lexicon but there
> is no way to be certain until we take a look at
> each individual aberrant case.

What flaws do you suspect?

- Rob