Re: [tied] *kW- "?"

From: Rob
Message: 40252
Date: 2005-09-21

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...> wrote:

> But if *e occurs only as an allophone in the set /e/, /o/, zero, of
> the phoneme *a, then 'palatalised velars' are palatalised only
> before the allophone /e/. In other words, the phoneme sequence
> *-k^a- (which is realised as *-ka- in proto-IE) has the allophones
> *-c^e-, *-ko-, *-k- in PIE.

That is certainly true from an articulatory point of view. Velars are
much more likely to be palatalized next to front vowels than any other
kind of vowel. It seems to me, then, that the centum-satem split did
not occur until after the separation of the qualitative Ablaut
allophones into independent phonemes. Then the IE velar series (at
least in the dialects that would later become the satem languages)
would have had palatalized allophones next to front vowels and non-
palatalized allophones otherwise.

- Rob

Previous in thread: 40249
Next in thread: 40253
Previous message: 40251
Next message: 40253

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts