Re: The pronunciation of post-velars (was Re: [tied] *kW- "?")

I stand corrected.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Miguel Carrasquer" <mcv@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: The pronunciation of post-velars (was Re: [tied] *kW- "?")


> On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:42:36 -0500, Patrick Ryan
> <proto-language@...> wrote:
>
> >1) because traditionally, 'uvular' was restricted to uvular trill, as in
> >certain German and French /R/s;
>
> I have before me the 1932 revision of the IPA chart. Under
> the heading "uvular" are listed the stops q and G, the nasal
> N, the rhotic R, the fricatives X and R*. The same sounds
> are given as "uvulaires" in Passy and Jones "Organic
> Alphabet" of 1907.
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>