Re: [tied] Some questions

From: glen gordon
Message: 40155
Date: 2005-09-20

Miguel claims:
> The theory is confirmed by the Kartvelian borrowing
> *ok^toh3 => os^txw, which retains the PIE /xW/.

This doesn't confirm anything. In fact, since we've
explained sufficiently why **k^ cannot exist in IE,
the Kartvelian reflex must suggest a _satemic_
borrowing (ie: "post-IE").

So, we are forced to reinterpret the process of this
loan as:

IE *októ:u
> IE satem dialect *os^tó:u => Kartv *os^txo

The *x is from the phonetic aspiration of *t in this
said dialect. Nothing at all is confirmed because
reasonable doubt logically persists as you can see.

In IE proper, since no other suffixes ending in
a confirmed labialized consonant exist **ANYWHERE**,
it stands to reason that **-h3 is most probably
phonotactically illegal for the IE language. Despite
these unsurmountable problems, Miguel continues to
persist with the impossible.


= gLeN


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com