[tied] Re: *kW- "?"

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, mkapovic@... wrote:

> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, mkapovic@... wrote:
> You may claim that Luwian etc. are residues
> which preserve the older stage of all satem-lgs but that doesn't
> change the fact that we have to reconstruct 3 velar series for IE, in
> spite of the fact that many scholars don't like that.

Do any of the other Anatolian languages preserve the 3-way
distinction? If not, then is it possible that this is a Luwian
innovation?