Piotr:
> The comparative evidence indicates a thematic
> present (*bHér-e-ti) beside a _reduplicated_
> athematic present (*bHi-bHér-ti) and traces of
> an athematic aorist.
Yes. So just to clarify, can someone please explain
to me how one might determine whether a later thematic
durative like *bHer-e-ti is from a subjunctivized
Narten stem (ie: < (pre-)IE durative-aorist *bHe:r-t)
or a subjunctivized aorist (ie: < *bHer-t). What
piece of evidence disambiguates the two possible
cases?
Help :)
= gLeN
______________________________________________________
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/