From: etherman23
Message: 39871
Date: 2005-09-03
> On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 15:39:02 +0000, etherman23wrote:
> <etherman23@...> wrote:
>
> >--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 22:22:18 +0000, etherman23
> >> <etherman23@...> wrote:
> >>
> >> >--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, glen gordon <glengordon01@...>
> >> >>Okay, forgot about that. But you still have the Skt., OCS, and Goth.
> >> >> Etherman23:
> >> >> > Don't you find it just a little bit too coincidental
> >> >> > that there's a reconstructable particle *H2ebhi?
> >> >>
> >> >> Shouldn't that be *h1ebHi with *h1? You're basing this
> >> >> on the Anatolian locatives like Lycian /ebi-/, right?
> >> >
> >> >I just double checked and it's actually H3ebhi, as in Lat. ob.
> >>
> >> Latin ob is likely from *(h1)op(i) ~ *(h1)epi.
> >
> >How do you explain the Latin voiced plosive?
>
> Final stops (after a vowel) are always voiced in Latin: *-t
> > -d, *-p > -b.