Miguel gets a lil' angry because I don't respond
to constant reiteration of irrelevant facts:
> Your views are based on not knowing the facts.
> Show me one athematic neuter wich is stressed on
> the suffix (hysterodynamic), and we can talk.
Alright. That's a comment worth responding to. The
problem is that these stems in *-om are in fact the
only possible evidence you are looking for!
Ironically, you yourself are ignoring the fact that
the accentuation is on the final syllable in *yugom.
Now, it's highly odd that only thematic stems would
acquire this oxytone accentuation. There's obviously
more to all of this then, but you're failing to
explain it and scolding me for addressing it.
> Otherwise, your theory goes straight to the
> trash-can.
This, coming from a man that proposes an entire
labialized carnival of extra sounds that IE doesn't
need, like **mW. Or, remember the time you claimed
that *?esh2r- 'blood' was **?esh2rgW-?
So perhaps you should be as harsh with your own
views as you are with others'.
= gLeN
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com