From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 39790
Date: 2005-08-26
> On what basis do you assert that the *earliest*Because it seems that the simple thematic presents accented on the root
> thematic presents have an accented thematic vowel?
> ... Which are by analogy with thematic aorists whichWhy should this kind of analogy have affected precisely those stems
> also have accent on the thematic vowel. Their
> original function would be to form verbs referring
> to a state of action. Indeed, in IE itself, they
> can describe a state of repetition.
> Oftentimes, *-ye- and *-ske- created denominal verbBut the sigmatic aorist is accented on the root!
> stems but they could also extend other pre-existing
> verb stems.
>
> We can etymologize *-ye- as being from relative
> pronoun *yo- and *-ske- would be from aorist *-s-
> plus emphatic particle *ge. These etymologies further
> suggest the denominal (and thus stative) character of
> these suffixes. That would make for a stronger
> connection at one time with the aorist, not the
> durative. That then explains the accent.
>>Originally, the thematic vowel in verbs might have
>>carried obligatory accent, later retracted if there
>>was a full vowel to the left of it.
>
>
> In order to explain paradigmatic vowel alternation in
> thematic vowels, whether they be in nouns or in verbs,
> the accent must be *off* of the thematic vowel at
> the time of Schwa Diffusion. Schwa Diffusion occurs
> after Acrostatic Regularization, thereby explaining
> how we have *bHer-e-si and yet also *bHer-o-mes with
> the least amount of further hypothesizing.
>
>
> = gLeN
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>