From: tgpedersen
Message: 39564
Date: 2005-08-09
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "elmeras2000" <jer@...> wrote:wrote:
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...>
> >reveal
> > > Is 'stem-final' a phonological term?
> >
> > Not directly. It's a morphological term, and the rule is
> > synchronically a morphophonological rule. Such rules generally
> > that certain parts of the morphology earlier offered specificrules
> > phonological conditions that caused the changes underlying the
> > observed. That's the way internal reconstruction works.is
>
> Examples of morphological rules in English include the doublets
> _bodice_/_bodies_ and _dice_/_dies_. The case of _pence_/pennies_
> a bit more complicated. The meanings with /s/ are collective, ifnot
> singular. In normal English, the six-sided object with dots on itis
> a 'dice', not a 'die'! 'Sixpence' is (was?) an amount, not sixcoins.
> (Post-decimalisation words like 'twelfpence' and 'twelfpenny'chiefly
> elicited puzzled looks.)My grandmother used to buy butter by the 'pund' (500 g) fifty years
>