Re: IE Thematic Vowel Rule

From: tgpedersen
Message: 39553
Date: 2005-08-08

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "elmeras2000" <jer@...> wrote:
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "etherman23" <etherman23@...>
wrote:
> >
> > Okay, I just had an idea. Obviously this needs to be checked out
> more,
> > but I'll throw it out anyway. Let's assume that stress (at least
in
> > thematic verbs) was originally on the first syllable. Then Jens'
Law
> > applied only to post-stress vowels (i.e. the thematic vowel). As
you
> > pointed out earlier there are stressed thematic vowels, so we
need an
> > explanation for this. I'm suggesting that when the stressed
syllable
> > was closed the accent shifted to the next syllable.
>
> You are inventing problems where none exist. My (or Saussure's)
> thematic vowel rule applies to thematic vowels, stressed and
> unstressed. Why does that demand an accent shift? The descriptive
> status of the thematic vowels is fully sufficient to make them
> eligible for this rule: They are stem-final vowels, and all stem-
final
> vowels act this was, be they accented or not. Some say they can't
> accept that for a language they analyze; then they should analyze
a
> different language.
>


Is 'stem-final' a phonological term?


Torsten