From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 39331
Date: 2005-07-19
>>>> Could you please refrain from attaching fancy emoticonsAnd I consider it a very bad idea in e-mail. (See, e.g.,
>>>> that add several kilobytes to your post, as this one
>>>> did? Some of us read these posts over a dial-up
>>>> connection, and you're already posting in an
>>>> inefficient format. (E.g., the post to which I'm
>>>> replying was three times as long as the same post would
>>>> have been in plain text.) Thank you.
>>> What is "inefficient" about the format?
>> I already told you: your posts are unnecessarily bloated.
>> The problem is that you're posting in HTML. As a result,
>> the message to which I'm responding actually consumed
>> 3784 bytes (excluding headers but including the crap
>> added by Yahoo), while the same message in plain text is
>> about 1700 bytes.
>> Incidentally, whatever program you're using also fails to
>> quote correctly.
>> Patrick:
> I prefer HTML.
> Perhaps you should get a larger HD; 2084 bytes is not muchPerhaps you should read what I said. My stated objection
> these days.
> What did you mean about "quote correctly"?A properly functioning mail program adds a layer of