Re: [tied] Re: passive, ingressive origins

> Brugman's law says that in Sanskrit -o- was lengthened in open
> syllable before it became -a:-.

Yes. You used this in your argument.

>What exactly do you mean when you
> refer to Brugmann's law in Latin?

I didn't mention Brugmann's law in Latin. I pointed out that Sanskrit,
Latin and Greek all show a pattern of syllabification across words and
morphemes which disproves your argument.

Peter