Re: [tied] Early PAlb Depalatisations of k', g' > k, g

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@...>
wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alex" <alxmoeller@...> wrote:
> > alexandru_mg3 wrote:
> > > In fact I talk here about the Same Phenomenon where d, g, b
> passed to
> > > zero in intervocalic positions in pollysyllabic words.
> > >
> > >
> > > The stages of these transformations were :
> > >
> > > Rules:
> > > ------
> > >
> > > a) d > dh > h > zero
> > > Example: vëlla 'brother' < PAlb *we-lauda: < *swe lauda:
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Marius
> >
> > modhulle, vjedhull for instance keep still in intervocalic "dh"
> >
> > Alex
> >
>
> Yes, because in sec VI-VIII when this late transformation was
> started these words has had already only 2 syllables (even if the
> final vowel was still there it was like lupi /lupI/ in Romanian )
>
> Best Regards,
> Marius

So around sec. VI-VIII we have:

a) mo-dhull(ë) , vje-dhull(ë) and vje-hërr(ë) that reflect one
pattern

Please see how similar is vje-hërr and vje-dhull

-> as result not only dh is there but also h is still there

and

b) *vë-ha-rë , *de-be-ta, ro-gu-Sa,

(but also vemje < *ve-mi-da < *wo-mi-da: )

that reflect the other pattern

Best Regards,
Marius