Re: passive, ingressive origins

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...>
wrote:

> I didn't know that. Thanks. So I'll stick to the

causative/iterative

> present stem. I suggest it can be analysed as:
>
> *mone- "state of thinking"
> *-h1 essive/translative
>
> *mone-h1 yóm- "I impel <obj.> to a state of thinking"
> *mone-h1 is- "you (sg.) impel <obj.> to a state of thinking"
> *mone-h1 it- "he impels <obj.> to a state of thinking"
>
> *mone-h1 yómV- "we impel <obj.> to a state of thinking"
> *mone-h1 itV- "you (pl.) impel <obj.> to a state of thinking"
> *mone-h1 yónt- "they impel <obj.> to a state of thinking"
>
> where the auxiliary is
> http://www.bartleby.com/61/roots/IE593.html
> but without the laryngeal.

You don't say? And how does the passive participle of the causative
*monitós, *soditós, which you apparently did not know either, fit
into this?

Jens