Re: [tied] Re: sum

Torsten:

>> > If it's not directly from pre-proto-Slavic *sumi?
>>
>> It may be if you disregard everything we know about Slavic
> linguistics.
>>
>
> I assume you are referring to some subset of Slavic linguistics. I
> wouldn't want to discard all those years of hard work. Which subset
> is it?

Just the well-established Slavic sound laws, nothing else...

Mate