Re: [tied] Stative Verbs, or Perfect Tense

From: tgpedersen
Message: 36640
Date: 2005-03-04

> How come 1st and 2nd pl. are so complicated that they are always
> left out of the analysis? Could it be that -m, -s, -t are not
> personal endings, but demonstratives (that would explain why
> plural is added later as an afterthought and doesn't behave nicely
> and agglutinatively)?

Sorry

Torsten

Previous in thread: 36639
Next in thread: 36644
Previous message: 36639
Next message: 36641

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts