From: tgpedersen
Message: 36629
Date: 2005-03-04
> On 05-03-03 12:34, tgpedersen wrote:New
>
> > So I proposed that the American
> > retroflex /r/ came from a substandard Dutch-based 17-18th c. New
> > York dialect, which became the language of the new immigrants to
> > York, whence it spread as the standard dialect to the rest ofthe US
> > (minus New England, which drops /r/'s, and Southern, which doeslatter
> > likewise. Miguel objected strongly to that idea.
>
> American /r/ varies in the phonemic continuum between "retroflex"
> (sublamino-postalveolar) and "bunched" (dorso-midpalatal), the
> variant prevailing by far, despite the popular opinion thatAmerican /r/
> is retroflex. I suspect that the two alleles, which are all buteffects
> indistinguishable to the ear (except that their coarticulatory
> may be different), naturally tend to occur in free variation.Similar
> realisations are common in SW England (in the former "West Saxon"area)
> and in Ireland, and I have little doubt that this is whereAmerican /r/
> came from.Of course a large part of the immigrants were Irish, and a large
>