*wekW-or-o- > eoperinos, wieczor (was: Evening/Night)

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Joao" <josimo70@...> wrote:

> w[e']kWer-o- > *eoper-os could be dialectal (instead of *eoteros)

or analogical to a *eopros or *eoporos.

How to check it (that it's dialectal)?

Also there is possibility, that Baltic *wa~karas from PIE wekW-or-,
then eoperinos in Greek and wieczo´r in Polish would be explained

> This doublets labiovelar+e, labiovelar+o > dental,velar, were

frequently "standardized" through analogy.

>
> For example, Erebos, erebeos (<*HregWos, *HregWesos), instead of

expected Erebos, eredeos.

>
> Joao SL
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: whetex_lewx
> To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 10:08 AM
> Subject: [tied] Evening/Night (was Re: The "Mother" Problem)

*wekwer-o-

>
>
>
> (h)[e']kWos > hippos kW > p before back "o"
>
> w[e']kWer-o- > *eoper-os > *eoper-in-os; -kW- versus -o- became -

p-.

>
>
>
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Joao" <josimo70@...> wrote:
> > No, kWe-,kWi- > te-, ti- (pe-,pi- in dialects).
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: whetex_lewx
> > To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 5:20 PM
> > Subject: [tied] Evening/Night (was Re: The "Mother" Problem)
> *wekwer-o-
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Joao" <josimo70@...>

wrote:

> > > *kWel - >Greek tel-
> > > *gWHen-yo: > Greek theino:
> > > *kWetwr- > Greek tettares, tessares
> >
> > HIPPOS?
> >
> > Maybe -kw- in your examples changed to -t- because it's in
> closed
> > syllable?
> >
> > Hi-ppos <ekW-os opened syllable???
> >
>